Take a Photo. AI Fills the Form
Your inspector takes a photo of any asset or defect. AI reads it and fills the inspection form automatically. No typing. No manual entry.

Convert your checklist into Mobile App
Pushback tug safety software is the platform ramp safety managers, ground handling supervisors, and tug drivers use to log pushback hazards and tug near-misses and to track risk controls in a safety management system. Inspectly360 digitises hazard reporting, near-miss capture, risk control tracking, and the nose-gear and aircraft-strike prevention evidence that maps to ISO 45001 and IATA IGOM across the ramp.
Everything your field team does on paper, Inspectly360 does automatically: faster, more accurate, and without the admin.
Your inspector takes a photo of any asset or defect. AI reads it and fills the inspection form automatically. No typing. No manual entry.
Inspectors speak their observations in any language. AI transcribes and fills the form in real time. Completely hands-free in the field.
The moment an inspection is submitted, a branded PDF, Excel, or CSV report generates automatically. No manual work. No waiting.
Inspectly360 integrates with the tools your team already uses, including Zoho, Microsoft 365, and SAP. No double entry.
Your operations team sees completion rates, open issues, and compliance scores across all sites in real time. No chasing updates.
What changes once pushback tug safety software runs on one mobile-first platform with photo proof and live dashboards.
Pushback tug safety software is the platform ramp safety managers, ground handling supervisors, and tug drivers use to log pushback hazards and tug near-misses and to track risk controls in a safety management system. Inspectly360 digitises hazard reporting, near-miss capture, risk control tracking, and the nose-gear and aircraft-strike prevention evidence that maps to ISO 45001 and IATA IGOM across the ramp.
Today a pushback hazard is mentioned at handover, a near-miss between a tug and an aircraft nose gear is reported verbally if at all, and the proof a control was applied is a memory. When a hazard repeats, a near-miss goes unrecorded, or a control has no owner, nobody sees the pattern until a nose-gear event or an injury makes it public. Across a busy ramp every shift handles safety reporting a little differently, so the safety manager cannot see where pushback hazards cluster by tug, stand, or shift.
Inspectly360 replaces that with mobile capture on iOS and Android: drivers and supervisors log hazards and near-misses with photo, location, and severity against the SMS, each risk control carries an owner and a deadline, and recurring hazards surface by tug and stand. Controls close with verified sign-off, and a branded SMS evidence pack exports per tug or stand when an ISAGO or SMS auditor asks for the pushback safety trail.
Ramp safety teams follow this loop for pushback hazard reporting, tug near-miss capture, and risk control closure.
Drivers and supervisors log a pushback hazard or tug near-miss on mobile with photo, location, the tug, and severity.
On pushback tug safety programmes, the report is assessed against the SMS risk matrix so the severity and likelihood drive the right response.
For pushback tug safety field teams, each control is assigned with an owner and a deadline so an agreed action is tracked, not just discussed.
Repeat hazards surface by tug, stand, and shift so the team fixes the root cause of nose-gear and strike risks.
Controls close with verified sign-off, and a branded SMS evidence pack exports per tug or stand for the auditor.
Answers to common long-tail questions, kept on one canonical page to avoid thin duplicate URLs.
Start with a single base so the hazard categories, the SMS risk matrix, and the control workflow are validated against real pushback reports before rollout to other stations and contracted handlers.
Tug drivers get hazard and near-miss capture, supervisors get risk assessment and control assignment, and the safety manager gets read access to the full SMS trail through role-based access.
The platform capabilities that power pushback tug safety software across every site.
Drivers and supervisors log a pushback hazard with photo, location, and severity in seconds. Why it matters: a hazard captured at the stand can be controlled before it causes a nose-gear event or an injury.
Each near-miss between a tug and an aircraft, person, or another vehicle is recorded with the circumstances. Why it matters: an unreported pushback near-miss is a missed warning the SMS is designed to catch.
Each control carries an owner, a deadline, and verified closure. Why it matters: a control agreed after a pushback incident but never assigned is the gap that lets the same event recur.
Repeat hazards surface by tug, stand, and shift. Why it matters: the safety manager fixes the root cause of nose-gear and strike risks rather than treating each event in isolation.
Hazards, near-misses, and open controls roll up across the tug fleet and the ramp. Why it matters: the safety manager sees where pushback risk concentrates without waiting for a verbal handover.
A branded SMS evidence pack exports per tug or stand for the auditor. Why it matters: an ISAGO or SMS request becomes a minutes-long export, not a search through hazard forms.
Ramp safety managers and ground handling supervisors comparing Inspectly360 to paper hazard forms, spreadsheet logs, and verbal near-miss reports see the difference fastest on pushback hazard capture, tug near-miss reporting, nose-gear and aircraft-strike risk controls, recurring hazard detection, and fleet-wide SMS visibility aligned to ISO 45001 and IATA IGOM.
| Topic | Typical Gaps | With Inspectly360 |
|---|---|---|
| Pushback hazard reporting | A pushback hazard is mentioned at handover and lost before anyone records or acts on it. | A pushback hazard is logged on mobile with photo, location, and severity against the SMS in seconds. |
| Tug near-miss capture | A near-miss between a tug and an aircraft nose gear is reported verbally, if at all, with no record. | Each near-miss is captured with the tug, the circumstances, and a photo for the safety review. |
| Risk control tracking | A control agreed after a pushback incident is not assigned, so nobody owns it or proves it was applied. | Each risk control carries an owner, a deadline, and verified closure on the SMS record. |
| Fleet-wide SMS visibility | The safety manager cannot see where pushback hazards cluster across tugs, stands, or shifts. | A live dashboard shows hazards, near-misses, and open controls across the tug fleet and the ramp. |
| Evidence for the safety auditor | Hazard forms are searched by hand when an ISAGO or SMS auditor asks for pushback safety records. | A scoped, timestamped SMS evidence pack exports per tug or stand in minutes. |
What changes once pushback tug safety software is standardised on Inspectly360.
Get started with inspection and audit checklist templates.
Use this template to perform a comprehensive safety inspection of light vehicles. This check ensures all critical components are checked ...
Use these apps to run inspections and audits.

by Inspectly360
Streamline facilities inspections with forms, photos, and reports.

by Inspectly360
Building condition and compliance inspections with evidence and follow-ups.

by Inspectly360
Digitize building inspection apps workflows with forms, evidence capture, and automated reporting.

by Inspectly360
Run building inspections on phones and tablets with offline forms, photo evidence, and instant reports.

by Inspectly360
Audit buildings with structured scoring, photo evidence, and corrective action tracking across portfolios.
A driver or supervisor who spots a pushback hazard logs it on mobile in seconds with a photo, the location, the tug involved, and a severity rating. The report enters the safety management system, is assessed against the risk matrix, and drives the right response without waiting for a handover conversation. Because the report carries a photo and a location, the safety team can see exactly what the hazard is and where it sits, rather than a vague verbal mention. This turns pushback hazards from things that are noticed and forgotten into tracked items that can be controlled before they cause a nose-gear event or a personal injury on the ramp.
Yes. The near-miss capture is built around the event and its circumstances, not the individual, which is the principle a just-culture SMS relies on. A driver records what happened between a tug and an aircraft, a person, or another vehicle, attaches a photo, and submits in seconds. The report goes to the safety team for assessment and control, not to a disciplinary process. Lowering the friction and the fear of reporting is how an operation surfaces more near-misses, and more near-misses reported means more warnings acted on before one becomes an actual nose-gear event or injury during pushback.
Yes. Capture works fully offline on iOS and Android, which matters on the apron, at remote stands, and at outstations where signal is weak. Drivers and supervisors log hazards and near-misses and supervisors assign controls with photos while offline, and records sync automatically once the device reconnects. Nothing is lost if a report is made in a dead spot, and the timestamp reflects when the event was captured, not when it synced. This keeps the SMS trail accurate for the safety manager and for an ISAGO or SMS auditor reviewing pushback safety across the tug fleet and the stands.
When a control is agreed after a pushback hazard or near-miss, it is assigned with an owner and a deadline rather than left as a discussion point. The control stays open and visible until the owner completes it and a supervisor verifies and signs it off. Because controls are tied to the originating report, the safety team can see whether the action that was supposed to prevent a recurrence was actually applied. This closes the common gap where a sensible control is agreed in a safety meeting but never implemented, which is exactly the failure that lets the same pushback event happen again, sometimes with a worse outcome the second time.
Every hazard and near-miss is tagged with the tug, the stand, the shift, and the hazard type. The platform surfaces repeats, so when the same hazard appears at the same stand or with the same tug type across several reports, it is flagged as recurring with its frequency and trend. This lets the safety manager move from treating individual events to fixing the root cause, whether that is a difficult stand geometry, a tug type with a recurring visibility issue, or a procedure that needs changing. Patterns that predict the next nose-gear event are invisible on paper forms but clear on the SMS dashboard.
Every hazard, near-miss, risk assessment, control, and closure is stored with a timestamp, the named person, and photo evidence against the specific tug or stand. When an ISAGO or SMS auditor asks for pushback safety records, you export a scoped, branded SMS evidence pack per tug or stand covering the audit window in minutes. The trail shows reports captured, risks assessed, controls assigned and closed with verified sign-off, and any recurring hazard addressed. This replaces the search-the-forms routine that paper hazard reporting forces, and the evidence is consistent across every shift and base in the operation.
Pushback Tug Safety Software on Inspectly360 connects directly to the inspection apps, checklist templates, forms, industries, and adjacent solutions linked below.
See Inspectly360 in action with a live demo tailored to your needs. No credit card required.