Take a Photo. AI Fills the Form
Your inspector takes a photo of any asset or defect. AI reads it and fills the inspection form automatically. No typing. No manual entry.
Quick Answer
Site inspection software is the platform that Site Engineers, Project Managers, and Construction Directors use to run snag lists, safety walks, quality inspections, and handover packs across multi-contractor capital projects where the field reality changes by the hour. Inspectly360 is built for construction sites where signal disappears in basements and lift shafts, where two hundred snags get raised in a single punch walk, and where the handover pack must arrive on the day of substantial completion rather than two weeks later.
AI-Powered Features for Your Field Workflows
Everything your field team does on paper, Inspectly360 does automatically: faster, more accurate, and without the admin.
Speak. AI Writes It Down.
Inspectors speak their observations in any language. AI transcribes and fills the form in real time. Completely hands-free in the field.
Inspections Done. Report Ready.
The moment an inspection is submitted, a branded PDF, Excel, or CSV report generates automatically. No manual work. No waiting.
Connect Your Existing Tools.
Inspectly360 integrates with the tools your team already uses, including Zoho, Microsoft 365, and SAP. No double entry.
Live Dashboard. Every Site. Always On.
Your operations team sees completion rates, open issues, and compliance scores across all sites in real time. No chasing updates.
Before and After Inspectly360
What changes once site inspection software runs on one mobile-first platform with photo proof and live dashboards.
Before Inspectly360
- Punch walks generate hundreds of photos that the PM scrolls through after hours. Drone surveys produce GB of imagery the QA team never gets through. Snags are missed because the volume is the problem, not the skill.
- Snags get assigned by name in WhatsApp groups. Subcontractors close items by replying with a photo. Nobody verifies the fix, and the same snag re-appears at the next punch walk.
- RFIs live in Procore, Aconex, or PlanRadar; inspection findings live elsewhere. When a snag triggers an RFI, the link is rebuilt by hand and the response chain loses context.
- Defects raised during the DLP are contested with verbal recollection and screenshots from email. NEC and JCT contract evidence requires a manual reconstruction the week before any meeting with the contractor.
- Handover packs assemble across the final two weeks of the project from a dozen sources. Owners receive 200-plus page PDFs days after substantial completion, with photos copy-pasted in by a coordinator.
After Inspectly360
- AI snag detection scans inspector photos and ingested drone imagery for cracks, finishing defects, MEP issues, and PPE gaps. Candidate snags surface to the PM for confirmation rather than burying them under raw galleries.
- Every snag carries trade, named subcontractor, deadline, required closure evidence, and a verification gate. Subs get scoped access to their items only; closure requires photo proof inspectors accept.
- REST API integrations push inspection findings into Procore, Aconex, PlanRadar, and Autodesk Construction Cloud. Snags that trigger RFIs carry the underlying evidence into the PM platform, not just a summary line.
- Every defect raised during DLP carries timestamp, zone, photo evidence, contractor sign-off, and a link to the original handover record. NEC and JCT contract evidence assembles in seconds, not days.
- Handover packs generate from the same record crews captured throughout the project: zone-by-zone evidence, snag closure trails, safety walk history, statutory sign-offs, and warranty documentation indexed automatically.
What Is Site Inspection Software, and How Do Project Managers Use It Across Capital Projects?
Site inspection software is the platform that Site Engineers, Project Managers, and Construction Directors use to run snag lists, safety walks, quality inspections, and handover packs across multi-contractor capital projects where the field reality changes by the hour. Inspectly360 is built for construction sites where signal disappears in basements and lift shafts, where two hundred snags get raised in a single punch walk, and where the handover pack must arrive on the day of substantial completion rather than two weeks later. AI snag detection compresses the photo and drone review effort, geofencing verifies inspector attendance, and every snag carries the closure trail the contract requires.
The pain it solves is the daily reality of construction operations: photos shared on WhatsApp without timestamp or zone, snag lists in Excel circulated by email, subcontractors self-certifying closure of items nobody verified, HSE walks recorded on paper that vanishes when the incident investigator needs them, and handover packs that assemble in panic the week before substantial completion. Capital projects with three-figure snag counts collapse the moment the final punch walk starts because the evidence chain was never built to scale.
Inspectly360 ships full offline Android and iOS apps with structured snag, quality, and safety templates, geotagged photo capture, drone imagery ingestion, and on-device AI snag detection. Every snag carries trade, named subcontractor, deadline, required closure evidence, and a verification gate so contract sign-off is grounded in proof. Findings integrate with Procore, Aconex, PlanRadar, and Autodesk Construction Cloud; handover packs and DLP defect registers generate from the same record the field captured throughout the project.
- OSHA 29 CFR 1926 sets the construction safety standard inspection templates are aligned to: OSHA 29 CFR 1926 — Construction Standards
- NEC and JCT contract frameworks reference the inspection and defects-liability evidence the platform supports: NEC Contracts
- ISO 9001 quality management referenced for construction quality plan alignment: ISO 9001 — Quality Management Systems
How Does a Construction Inspection Programme Run from RFI to Handover Pack?
Construction Directors standardise this five-step loop when rolling out across multi-contractor capital projects.
- 1
Set Up Project Zones, Trades, and Templates
Define the project zone structure, named contractors, trades, and the snag, safety, and handover templates per stage; templates inherit from the construction quality plan rather than being rebuilt per project.
- 2
Assign Work and Verify Attendance
Push packages to Site Engineers, subs, and QA inspectors with due dates; optional GPS geofencing validates physical attendance per zone for handover sign-off and DLP defect evidence.
- 3
Capture Snags and Ingest Drone Imagery Offline
Crews capture snags offline in basements, lift shafts, and steel decks; drone imagery ingests via API as structured payloads attached to zones, photos, and the relevant inspection template.
- 4
Apply AI Snag Detection and Confirm
AI snag detection scans inspector photos and ingested drone imagery for cracks, finishing defects, MEP issues, and PPE gaps; PMs and QA inspectors confirm classification before snags reach the contractor.
- 5
Close Out with Handover Pack and DLP Evidence
Branded handover PDFs, DLP defect registers, and Procore or Aconex pushes generate from the same record through /features/integrations and /features/automated-reports.
How Do Construction Directors Pilot Site Inspections Across Multiple Contractors?
Answers to common long-tail questions, kept on one canonical page to avoid thin duplicate URLs.
Where Does Inspectly360 Sit Beside Procore, Aconex, PlanRadar, and Autodesk Construction Cloud?
Inspectly360 sits as the site inspection and field evidence layer beside the project management platforms construction teams already run. Procore, Aconex, PlanRadar, and Autodesk Construction Cloud stay the system of record for the project schedule, RFIs, submittals, and document control. Inspectly360 produces the inspection-level field evidence, snag detail, safety walk records, drone imagery review, and handover packs those platforms aggregate. REST API integrations push snags as issues, RFIs, or punch list items with the photo and drone evidence intact rather than as text-only summaries.
How Do Drone Inspections and Human Walks Work Together?
Drone platforms (DJI, Skydio, third-party survey providers) ingest imagery via API as structured payloads attached to the project zone, the inspection template, and the relevant stage. AI snag detection runs across drone imagery and inspector photos under one review queue so the PM disposes of both with one workflow. Human inspectors still walk safety-critical and statutory zones where regulators or insurers require human attendance, with the audit trail showing both data sources side by side.
Procurement, Device Management, and Contractor Distribution
Most contractors distribute the field app via MDM (Intune, Jamf, Workspace ONE), managed install links, or subcontractor portals so the right crews get the right builds. Offline-first execution means install, template sync, and capture all work in low-coverage sites. Procurement and IT should validate SSO via SAML or OIDC, RBAC granular enough to scope a subcontractor to their assigned trade and zone, configurable evidence retention through the defects liability period, and a documented integration path into the project management platform already in use.
BIM Context and Coordinated Construction Quality Plans
Inspectly360 carries BIM context through external links to model views (BIM 360, Trimble Connect, Revizto) rather than rendering models in-app. Inspection templates reference the BIM element identifier where applicable so a snag against a duct, a beam, or a finish ties back to the model element. Coordinated construction quality plans (CQP, ITPs) translate into versioned templates with required photo evidence per stage, so the field execution matches the approved CQP rather than diverging on-site.
Which Capabilities Help Site Teams Run Snags, Safety Walks, and Drone Reviews?
The platform capabilities that power site inspection software across every site.
Ready to Move Site Inspection Off Paper?
Book a Free DemoHow Is This Different from WhatsApp Snag Lists, Excel Punch Lists, and Generic Field Apps?
Site Engineers, Project Managers, and Construction Directors comparing Inspectly360 to Excel snag lists, WhatsApp photos, and email-driven PDFs see the difference fastest on five dimensions: AI snag detection on photo and drone evidence, subcontractor accountability, RFI and project management integration, defects liability period traceability, and handover pack speed.
| Topic | Typical Gaps | With Inspectly360 |
|---|---|---|
| AI snag detection on photos and drone imagery | Punch walks generate hundreds of photos that the PM scrolls through after hours. Drone surveys produce GB of imagery the QA team never gets through. Snags are missed because the volume is the problem, not the skill. | AI snag detection scans inspector photos and ingested drone imagery for cracks, finishing defects, MEP issues, and PPE gaps. Candidate snags surface to the PM for confirmation rather than burying them under raw galleries. |
| Subcontractor accountability | Snags get assigned by name in WhatsApp groups. Subcontractors close items by replying with a photo. Nobody verifies the fix, and the same snag re-appears at the next punch walk. | Every snag carries trade, named subcontractor, deadline, required closure evidence, and a verification gate. Subs get scoped access to their items only; closure requires photo proof inspectors accept. |
| RFI integration and project management linkage | RFIs live in Procore, Aconex, or PlanRadar; inspection findings live elsewhere. When a snag triggers an RFI, the link is rebuilt by hand and the response chain loses context. | REST API integrations push inspection findings into Procore, Aconex, PlanRadar, and Autodesk Construction Cloud. Snags that trigger RFIs carry the underlying evidence into the PM platform, not just a summary line. |
| Defects Liability Period and contract evidence | Defects raised during the DLP are contested with verbal recollection and screenshots from email. NEC and JCT contract evidence requires a manual reconstruction the week before any meeting with the contractor. | Every defect raised during DLP carries timestamp, zone, photo evidence, contractor sign-off, and a link to the original handover record. NEC and JCT contract evidence assembles in seconds, not days. |
| Handover pack speed | Handover packs assemble across the final two weeks of the project from a dozen sources. Owners receive 200-plus page PDFs days after substantial completion, with photos copy-pasted in by a coordinator. | Handover packs generate from the same record crews captured throughout the project: zone-by-zone evidence, snag closure trails, safety walk history, statutory sign-offs, and warranty documentation indexed automatically. |
What Changes for Site Engineers, PMs, Subcontractors, and Owner Representatives?
What changes once site inspection software is standardised on Inspectly360.
- Construction Directors: One portfolio view across projects, snag closure rates by contractor, repeat defect trends, and handover readiness without weekly status reconstruction.
- Project Managers: Punch walks generate AI-prioritised snag queues rather than raw photo galleries, and handover packs assemble continuously rather than in a panic the final week.
- Site Engineers and QA Inspectors: Offline capture, BIM element references, and AI-assisted snag classification keep the field work in the field rather than in evening admin sessions.
- Subcontractors and Trades: Scoped access to their assigned snags only, clear closure evidence requirements, and a vendor scorecard they can see across the project.
- Owner Representatives and Client Side: Real-time visibility into snag closure progress, statutory sign-offs, and handover readiness without waiting for the Monday report.
- HSE Leads on Site: AI-assisted hazard review on inspector photos collapses gallery time and surfaces repeat hazards that lagging-indicator data alone misses.
- Quantity Surveyors and Contract Administrators: NEC and JCT contract evidence assembles in seconds rather than from email recall when contractor disputes arise.
Which Construction Snag and Safety Checklists Should You Try First?
Get started with inspection and audit checklist templates.
Snagging / Punch List
Snagging Inspection Checklist
Catch defects before handover and generate punch list reports in minutes. Room-by-room finish checks, evidence, and corrective actions.
52,000+GET
Snagging / Punch List
New Build Apartment Snagging Checklist
Pre-handover snagging for new build apartments. Room-by-room finish checks, MEP, and defect tracking before keys.
28,500+GET
Safety Inspection
Scaffolding Inspection Checklist
Utilize this Scaffolding Safety Inspection Checklist to spot hazards, verify stability, and ensure compliance with safety standards before work begins.
19,800+GET
Service Report
Field Service Report Form
Capture job details, measurements, work performed, photos, and sign-offs in one structured field service report form.
14,200+GET
Which Site Inspection Apps Run on iOS and Android in the Field?
Use these apps to run inspections and audits.
Site Inspection App
by Inspectly360
siteconstructioncompliance
Site-level inspections for construction, safety, and compliance.
Get the App
Building Inspection App
by Inspectly360
buildingcomplianceinspection
Building condition and compliance inspections with evidence and follow-ups.
Get the App
Safety Inspection App
by Inspectly360
safetycomplianceevidence
Safety inspections with offline capture, evidence, and compliance reporting.
Get the App
Construction Inspection App
by Inspectly360
constructioninspection
Digitize construction inspection workflows with forms, evidence capture, and automated reporting.
Get the App
Snag List App
by Inspectly360
snaglist
Digitize snag list workflows with forms, evidence capture, and automated reporting.
Get the App
Frequently Asked Questions About Site Inspection Software
How does the snag list workflow run from initial walk to verified closure?
Each snag captured during a site walk auto-creates an issue with photo evidence, GPS location, zone reference, severity, BIM element link where applicable, and the named subcontractor or trade responsible. The snag inherits a deadline and an escalation rule from the project standard. Subcontractors get scoped access to view and respond to their assigned snags through a mobile app or web portal, with no visibility into other contractors' snags or other zones. Closure requires photo evidence of the fix uploaded by the contractor; the PM or QA inspector reviews the evidence and either accepts closure or re-opens the snag with a comment. The full snag closure trail replaces Excel-on-WhatsApp workflows and gives the owner and main contractor a defensible record at handover.
How does Inspectly360 integrate with RFI workflows in Procore, Aconex, and PlanRadar?
When a site inspection finding requires clarification from the design team, the PM can promote the snag into an RFI inside Procore, Aconex, or PlanRadar through the integration. The integration carries the underlying photo evidence, zone reference, BIM element link, and the inspector's narrative into the RFI rather than just a text summary, so the design team responds with the same context the field had. The RFI response and any associated drawing markups flow back into the snag record for closure decisions. This keeps the RFI process inside the platforms construction teams already use for design coordination while preserving the site inspection chain of evidence.
How are drone surveys and aerial inspections ingested and reviewed?
Drone imagery from DJI, Skydio, and third-party survey providers ingests via API as structured payloads attached to the project zone, the relevant stage, and the inspection template. The imagery enters the same AI review queue as inspector photos, so a PM or QA inspector reviews candidate snags from drone footage and inspector capture in one workflow rather than two. Annotated drone orthomosaics and 360 imagery can be linked into the snag record for trade reference. For facade, roof, and large-area inspections, drone capture replaces several hours of access scaffolding inspection time while still feeding into a snag closure trail acceptable to the contract administrator.
How does the platform enforce subcontractor accountability without exposing other trades?
Each subcontractor gets a scoped account that surfaces only the snags, zones, and inspection records explicitly assigned to their trade and contract package. They can upload photo evidence of the fix, respond to inspector comments, and download their own snag closure PDFs, but they cannot see other subcontractors' work, other zones outside their package, or any commercial or owner-side information unless those scopes are explicitly granted. RBAC is enforced server-side rather than just in the UI, so a tampered request cannot escalate visibility across trades. A subcontractor scorecard (snag count, closure time, re-open rate, repeat defect rate) is visible to the PM and the construction director.
What goes into a handover pack and how fast can it assemble?
A handover pack generated from Inspectly360 includes: zone-by-zone evidence of inspection completion, the snag register with closure trails, ITP and CQP sign-offs, statutory inspections (fire NOC, lift licence, electrical certification), warranty documentation references, safety walk history through the construction phase, drone or photo evidence of completed works, and contractor sign-off signatures. The pack generates in one click from the same record the field captured throughout the project, indexed by zone or by element class. On most projects the pack is ready on the day of substantial completion rather than the typical two-week scramble, and it is structured for owner acceptance under NEC, JCT, or local equivalent.
How does the platform support evidence through the Defects Liability Period?
Every defect raised during the DLP enters as a new snag tied to the original handover record for the zone, asset, or element. The defect carries timestamp, photo evidence, contractor sign-off requirement, and a link to the handover sign-off it relates to. NEC, JCT, and FIDIC contract evidence for DLP claims assembles in seconds: any zone or element shows its handover sign-off, its DLP defects, the contractor responses, and the closure evidence in one record. Owner representatives and contractors operating on the same defect see only their scoped view, which keeps commercial information appropriate to the role while the underlying evidence stays consistent.
Explore More Site Inspection Software Apps, Checklists, and Industries
Site Inspection Software on Inspectly360 connects directly to the inspection apps, checklist templates, forms, industries, and adjacent solutions linked below.
Related Apps
Related Checklists
Related Templates
Related Forms
Related Solutions
Related Categories
Less Paperwork. More Visibility.
See Inspectly360 in action with a live demo tailored to your needs. No credit card required.
- 30 Days Free Trail
- 1000+ Templates
- Unlimited Integration
