Take a Photo. AI Fills the Form
Your inspector takes a photo of any asset or defect. AI reads it and fills the inspection form automatically. No typing. No manual entry.

Convert your checklist into Mobile App
Taxiway audit software is the platform aerodrome certification teams, safeguarding officers, and auditors use to run taxiway audits and produce traceable evidence across the system. Inspectly360 digitises audit findings, photo evidence, finding-to-closure tracking, and scoped evidence packs in one record aligned to ICAO Annex 14 and FAA 14 CFR Part 139.
Everything your field team does on paper, Inspectly360 does automatically: faster, more accurate, and without the admin.
Your inspector takes a photo of any asset or defect. AI reads it and fills the inspection form automatically. No typing. No manual entry.
Inspectors speak their observations in any language. AI transcribes and fills the form in real time. Completely hands-free in the field.
The moment an inspection is submitted, a branded PDF, Excel, or CSV report generates automatically. No manual work. No waiting.
Inspectly360 integrates with the tools your team already uses, including Zoho, Microsoft 365, and SAP. No double entry.
Your operations team sees completion rates, open issues, and compliance scores across all sites in real time. No chasing updates.
What changes once taxiway audit software runs on one mobile-first platform with photo proof and live dashboards.
Taxiway audit software is the platform aerodrome certification teams, safeguarding officers, and auditors use to run taxiway audits and produce traceable evidence across the system. Inspectly360 digitises audit findings, photo evidence, finding-to-closure tracking, and scoped evidence packs in one record aligned to ICAO Annex 14 and FAA 14 CFR Part 139. Taxiway audit software for aerodrome certification teams and auditors building evidence packs with timestamped findings, photo proof, and full traceability per taxiway segment.
Today audit findings are handwritten, the photos sit in a gallery detached from the finding, and whether something was closed is reconstructed from email after the fact. When an auditor asks for evidence covering a window, the team scrambles across binders and drives, and a repeat finding on a segment is missed because past audits are filed away rather than compared. Across the taxiway system, each audit is recorded a little differently, so traceability from finding to closure is hard to demonstrate.
Inspectly360 replaces that with mobile capture on iOS and Android: auditors raise findings against a taxiway segment with a timestamp, photo, and named sign-off, and each finding tracks an owner, action, and verified closure. Audit history attaches to each segment so repeat findings are visible, and a scoped, branded evidence pack exports per taxiway and window when the auditor asks.
Certification teams and auditors follow this loop for taxiway audit findings, corrective actions, and the evidence pack.
Set the audit scope across taxiway segments, signs, marking runs, lighting circuits, and shoulders so every finding is recorded against a known area.
Auditors record findings on mobile with a timestamp, photo, and named sign-off, even offline across the taxiway system.
Across the taxiway audit portfolio, each finding gets an owner, a corrective action, and a deadline so the path to closure is clear from the start.
On taxiway audit programmes, corrective actions are followed to verified closure with evidence, so a finding is not closed on a claim alone.
A scoped, branded evidence pack exports per taxiway and audit window with every finding, photo, and closure included.
Answers to common long-tail questions, kept on one canonical page to avoid thin duplicate URLs.
Start with one group of taxiways so the audit scope, finding categories, and evidence-pack format are validated against a real certification audit before rollout to the rest of the system, runways, and aprons.
Auditors get finding capture and sign-off, action owners get their assigned corrective actions, and the certification team gets read access to the full evidence trail per taxiway through role-based access.
The platform capabilities that power taxiway audit software across every site.
Each finding carries an automatic timestamp and named auditor. Why it matters: a finding with a questionable date is one an auditor can challenge, so accurate timing is the foundation of a defensible audit.
Every finding holds its own photo against the taxiway segment. Why it matters: a photo detached from its finding proves nothing, while a linked photo is the evidence an auditor accepts.
Across the taxiway audit portfolio, each finding gets an owner, action, and deadline followed to closure. Why it matters: an open finding with no owner is exactly what an audit re-flags at the next visit.
On taxiway audit programmes, findings close on evidence, not on a claim that the work was done. Why it matters: a finding closed without proof reopens under scrutiny and damages audit confidence.
Audit findings attach to each taxiway segment over time. Why it matters: a repeat finding on the same segment signals a systemic issue rather than a one-off.
A branded evidence pack exports per taxiway and audit window. Why it matters: an auditor request becomes a minutes-long export instead of a multi-day binder assembly.
Aerodrome certification teams and auditors comparing Inspectly360 to paper audit forms, spreadsheet finding logs, and email evidence trails see the difference fastest on timestamped findings, photo evidence, finding-to-closure traceability, scoped evidence packs, and per-segment audit history aligned to ICAO Annex 14 and FAA 14 CFR Part 139.
| Topic | Typical Gaps | With Inspectly360 |
|---|---|---|
| Timestamped findings | Audit findings are handwritten with dates that may not match when the inspection actually happened. | Each finding carries an automatic timestamp and the named auditor so the record is defensible. |
| Photo evidence per finding | Photos sit in a phone gallery, detached from the finding they were meant to support. | Each finding holds its own photo evidence against the taxiway segment it was raised on. |
| Finding-to-closure traceability | Whether a finding was closed, and by whom, is reconstructed from email threads after the fact. | Each finding tracks owner, action, and verified closure so the full lifecycle is traceable. |
| Scoped evidence pack | Evidence is assembled by hand from binders and drives whenever an auditor requests it. | A scoped, branded evidence pack exports per taxiway and window for the auditor in minutes. |
| Per-segment audit history | Past audit findings are filed away and rarely compared against the current condition of a segment. | Audit history attaches to each taxiway segment so repeat findings and trends are visible. |
What changes once taxiway audit software is standardised on Inspectly360.
Get started with inspection and audit checklist templates.
Use this template to perform a comprehensive safety inspection of light vehicles. This check ensures all critical components are checked ...
Use these apps to run inspections and audits.

by Inspectly360
Streamline facilities inspections with forms, photos, and reports.

by Inspectly360
Building condition and compliance inspections with evidence and follow-ups.

by Inspectly360
Digitize building inspection apps workflows with forms, evidence capture, and automated reporting.

by Inspectly360
Run building inspections on phones and tablets with offline forms, photo evidence, and instant reports.

by Inspectly360
Audit buildings with structured scoring, photo evidence, and corrective action tracking across portfolios.
Each finding is raised against a specific taxiway segment with an automatic timestamp, a photo, and the named auditor, so its origin is never in doubt. From there the finding tracks an owner, a corrective action, a deadline, and a verified closure, so the full lifecycle from raised to resolved is visible on one record. This replaces the common situation where a finding is handwritten, the photo sits separately in a gallery, and whether it was closed is later reconstructed from email. For an auditor, traceability is the whole point: a finding you can follow end to end with evidence at each step is far stronger than a note that relies on memory and scattered attachments from different shifts and audits.
You scope the export by taxiway and audit window, and the platform assembles a branded evidence pack containing every finding, its photo, its corrective action, and its closure within that scope. Because the data is captured against segments in real time, the pack is produced in minutes rather than assembled by hand from binders and drives. The auditor receives a consistent, timestamped record instead of a stack of forms in different formats from different shifts. This matters because the speed and consistency of the evidence often shape an auditor's confidence as much as the findings themselves, and a clean pack reduces the back-and-forth that drags a taxiway audit out over days while the team hunts for supporting records.
Yes. Finding capture works fully offline on iOS and Android, which matters across a large taxiway system and in areas where signal is weak. Auditors raise findings with photos and named sign-off while offline, and records sync automatically once the device reconnects. The timestamp reflects when the finding was actually raised, not when it synced, which is essential for audit traceability. Nothing is lost when an audit is run in a no-coverage area. This reliability protects the integrity of the evidence, because a finding with a wrong or missing timestamp is precisely the kind of weakness an auditor will probe and that can undermine confidence in the whole taxiway audit record.
A finding closes on verified evidence rather than on a claim that the work was done. The owner records the corrective action with photo proof, and the closure is confirmed against the original finding and its segment. This prevents the gap where a finding is marked complete but the underlying issue persists, only to be re-flagged at the next audit. Because each closure carries its own evidence and named sign-off, the certification team can demonstrate not just that findings were raised but that they were genuinely resolved. For an auditor, verified closure with proof is the difference between a credible corrective-action process and a checkbox exercise that does not survive scrutiny on the taxiway system.
Yes. Audit findings attach to each taxiway segment over time, so the certification team can see whether the same issue keeps appearing on a particular segment, sign, marking run, or lighting circuit. A repeat finding signals a systemic problem rather than a one-off, which changes the corrective action from a quick fix to addressing the root cause. This history is valuable both internally and during an external audit, because it shows the airport is tracking patterns rather than treating each audit as a blank slate. Without it, a recurring deficiency can slip through simply because past findings were filed away and never compared against the segment's current condition at the next visit.
Yes. Role-based access scopes each user to the findings and segments relevant to them. Auditors get finding capture and sign-off, action owners see only their assigned corrective actions, and the certification team keeps the full evidence trail across the taxiway system. An external auditor can be given read access scoped to the relevant taxiway and window without exposing unrelated records. This controlled access is itself part of a credible audit process, and access changes are logged so the trail shows who could see and sign off on what, and when. The result is a record that is both open enough for scrutiny and controlled enough to keep accountability clear.
Taxiway Audit Software on Inspectly360 connects directly to the inspection apps, checklist templates, forms, industries, and adjacent solutions linked below.
See Inspectly360 in action with a live demo tailored to your needs. No credit card required.