
“Inspectly360 transformed how we manage site safety inspections. The offline capability alone saved us countless hours. Our compliance rate jumped from 72% to 96% in just three months.”
Sarah Mitchell
Meridian Construction Group

Convert your checklist into Mobile App
Looking for FMEA software built around how your team analyses risk? We provide it. Inspectly360 delivers a tailored failure mode and effects analysis solution on our platform, configured to your scoring and action tracking. Book a demo to scope it.
FMEA software runs failure mode and effects analysis: identifying what could go wrong in a product or process, scoring the risk, defining controls, and tracking the actions that reduce it. Inspectly360 provides an FMEA solution tailored to your operation, built on our analysis and workflow platform and configured to your scoring scale and process.
Done in a spreadsheet, an FMEA is built for a launch and then abandoned. Failure modes are listed once, severity, occurrence, and detection scores are never revisited, recommended actions are not tracked, and the analysis no longer reflects the product or process it describes.
We deliver your FMEA solution in five steps, from scoping your scoring to rollout and support.
We map your FMEA type, scoring scale, and how actions are managed, so the solution matches how your team actually analyses failure modes.
We build failure-mode analysis on the platform with severity, occurrence, and detection scoring and a risk priority number where you use one.
We configure recommended controls and action items with owners and due dates, so risk reduction is tracked rather than just documented.
You run the solution on one product or process, so the analysis and action loop is proven before it scales.
We roll the solution across your products and processes and support it, with FMEA status and revision history live for your quality team.
FMEA software covers proactive failure mode and effects analysis: failure modes, scoring, controls, action items, and revision history for process and design FMEA. The scope below is what the platform runs and records, distinct from workplace hazard assessment and from investigating failures after they occur.
Inspectly360 is the FMEA analysis and action layer beside your QMS or PLM, not a replacement for it. Your PLM can hold the product and design data, and a wider QMS can hold audits and document control. Inspectly360 owns the FMEA workflow: failure-mode analysis, scoring, controls, action items, and revision history. FMEAs link back to the product or process, so the analysis and its actions sit beside your systems of record without duplicating them.
Validate four things during the pilot rather than after. First, that failure modes, effects, and causes can be captured with your scoring. Second, that severity, occurrence, detection, and priority work on your scale. Third, that action items are owned and tracked to completion. Fourth, that FMEAs can be reviewed and revised with history. Run one product or line so the analysis and action loop is proven before it scales.
FMEA records inform design and process decisions, so their integrity matters. Inspectly360 enforces role-based access so teams run analysis, quality reviews scoring and actions, and leadership sees risk status. Failure modes, scores, controls, actions, and revisions are logged and retained for the period your quality and customer requirements demand, so any claim about how a risk was analysed and reduced can be traced to its evidence with time and author preserved.
An FMEA rollout works best product by product or process by process rather than all at once. Start where risk or a launch is most pressing, prove the analysis and action loop there, then extend. Existing FMEAs import so teams do not start empty. Because the analysis is configuration rather than code, each product can carry its own scoring while risk priority and open actions roll up to one view for quality leadership.
What FMEA Software covers for your team.
Teams comparing Inspectly360 to spreadsheets for FMEA see the difference on five points: currency, scoring, action tracking, revision history, and reuse.
| Capability | Without Inspectly360 | With Inspectly360 |
|---|---|---|
| Currency | The FMEA is built for a launch and then abandoned, so it no longer matches the product or process. | FMEAs are reviewed and revised, so the analysis reflects the current product and process. |
| Scoring | Severity, occurrence, and detection are scored inconsistently, so risk priority is unreliable. | Scoring uses your defined scale, so risk priority is consistent and comparable. |
| Action tracking | Recommended actions are listed but not tracked, so the highest risks stay unaddressed. | Action items carry owners and due dates tracked to completion, so risk is actively reduced. |
| Revision history | There is no history of how the FMEA changed, so lessons and rationale are lost. | Review and revision history is preserved, so the analysis has a traceable record. |
| Reuse | Each FMEA starts from a blank spreadsheet, so knowledge is not carried across products. | FMEAs build on prior analysis, so failure-mode knowledge is reused across products and processes. |
Manage every checklist in one connected workspace, capture evidence on mobile at the point of work, and let AI turn field inputs into clear, stakeholder-ready reports in minutes.


See which checklists your team has in progress across every site, jump into the same inspection with one tap, and keep field, supervisor, and back-office views in sync without sending screenshots on WhatsApp.


Every team reports differently. Build the report your operations, quality, or compliance leads actually want to read, share it as a branded PDF, and schedule delivery to the stakeholders who need it.


See completion, pass rate, and recurring findings across every checklist and every site, without pulling spreadsheets together at the end of the month.
What changes once fmea software is standardised on Inspectly360.







“Inspectly360 transformed how we manage site safety inspections. The offline capability alone saved us countless hours. Our compliance rate jumped from 72% to 96% in just three months.”
Sarah Mitchell
Meridian Construction Group

“The AI-powered defect detection has changed how we work. Our inspectors capture photos and the system flags issues we'd have missed. It's like having an expert reviewer on every site visit.”
James Chen
Pacific Manufacturing Co.

“Rolling out digital checklists across multiple projects gave us instant visibility into recurring safety issues. We now resolve critical findings in hours instead of days.”
Olivia Carter
Northbridge Infrastructure
Get started with inspection and audit checklist templates.

This Gap Analysis ISO 9001 Checklist can help you prepare for ISO 9001:2015 certification. Use this to evaluate if ...

This ISO 45001 readiness checklist can help you identify areas of your business that require further work before your external ...
Use these apps to run inspections and audits.

by Inspectly360
Simplify facilities inspections with forms, photos, and reports.

by Inspectly360
Building condition and compliance inspections with evidence and follow-ups.

by Inspectly360
Digitize building inspection apps workflows with forms, evidence capture, and automated reporting.

by Inspectly360
Run building inspections on phones and tablets with offline forms, photo evidence, and instant reports.

by Inspectly360
Audit buildings with structured scoring, photo evidence, and corrective action tracking across portfolios.
The three are often confused but answer different questions. FMEA is proactive: it analyses what could go wrong in a product, process, or system before it does, scores the risk, and drives actions to reduce it. HIRA, hazard identification and risk assessment, is about workplace hazards and the safety risk they present. Root cause analysis is reactive: it investigates why something that has already gone wrong actually happened. Keeping FMEA focused on proactive failure-mode analysis is what stops these becoming three near-identical pages. Inspectly360 provides each as a connected solution, so an FMEA can inform controls, a HIRA can assess workplace risk, and an RCA can investigate a failure, without one trying to be the others. If your need is analysing potential failures before they occur, FMEA is the right page.
We build your FMEA solution on the Inspectly360 platform and configure it to your process, rather than handing you a fixed product. Our team scopes your FMEA type, scoring scale, and how actions are managed, configures the failure-mode analysis, severity, occurrence, and detection scoring, controls, action items, and revision history to match, and rolls it out with a pilot product or line first. Because the platform is built for configurable analysis, scoring, action tracking, and reporting, an FMEA solution tailored to your process is delivered without custom code. You get software shaped to how your team actually analyses failure modes, supported by our team, rather than the spreadsheet that gets built for a launch and then abandoned.
Yes. Each failure mode is scored for severity, occurrence, and detection on the scale your process uses, and where you work with a risk priority number the solution calculates and holds it, so the highest-priority failure modes stand out for action. Because scoring uses a defined scale rather than each engineer's judgement, the numbers are consistent and comparable across an FMEA and across products, which is what makes prioritisation trustworthy. As controls are put in place and reduce occurrence or improve detection, the scores and priority can be reassessed, so the FMEA reflects the risk that actually remains rather than the risk at the start. Holding scoring and priority in a system rather than a spreadsheet is what lets you sort, filter, and report by risk and direct effort where it matters most.
Yes, and this is where an FMEA earns its value. Identifying and scoring failure modes only matters if the recommended actions actually happen, so each action item carries an owner and a due date and is tracked to completion rather than being left in a spreadsheet column. As actions complete, the failure mode can be re-scored to reflect the reduced risk, so the FMEA shows progress rather than a static list of intentions. Because actions and their status sit on the FMEA and roll up to reporting, a quality lead can see which high-priority failure modes still have open actions across products and chase them, which is exactly what turns an FMEA from a document produced for an audit into a live tool that genuinely reduces risk over time.
Yes. The solution supports both process FMEA and design FMEA, configured to the structure and scoring each uses, so a single platform covers the analysis your team runs rather than forcing everything into one format. Because FMEAs are living documents, review and revision are built in: an FMEA can be reviewed on a cadence and revised when the product, process, or a control changes, with a full history of how it evolved preserved. That history matters for traceability and for audits, which expect to see that FMEAs are maintained rather than written once. Keeping FMEAs current and their revisions recorded is one of the main reasons to manage them in a system, because a stale FMEA that no longer matches the product is worse than none, and revision history is what keeps the analysis honest.
See Inspectly360 in action with a live demo tailored to your needs. No credit card required.